SAFETY Oxalic acid is commonly used for bleaching decks and cleaning metal, and has a long history of being safely used, with standard precautions. And in the processes of weighing and mixing, tiny crystals of acid and droplets of solution invariably spill onto work surfaces. I make a point of wearing safety glasses in case of splashes and nitrile or kitchen gloves the label calls for the wearing of 14 mil gloves. Wearing gloves reminds me not to touch anything, and to clean up any tiny splashes or spills.
August 3, at I have to repeat what someone else wrote in one of the earlier comments: Are you kidding me???
Honestly, I normally think that almost everything you have to say is great, but I have to say that this post of yours has me totally confused. I was utterly certain when I started reading your blog post—after reading the fluff piece in the online magazine that you linked to—that you were going to go on to turn this guy Lieberman into a cautionary tale, rather than holding him up as your perfect role model.
Yes, of course it is extremely impressive to have all those Nature and Science articles but please bear in mind that they are mostly really really short and do not represent anything like a series of important scientific advances. They throw in a sop to empirical reality in a couple of throwaway lines at the end of the article, mentioning only two possible wildly diverging empirical applications of their entirely theoretical study.
Like several other commentators have written, Lieberman represents almost the exact opposite of your crucial argument: What thing of great importance did that research give us? Most importantly, he has empirically uncovered a mathematical rule, but told us absolutely zero about the theoretical importance of that empirical finding, if there is one at all.
What plausible mechanism could we think of that would account for this empirical finding? And is it a good model for a satisfying and intellectually stimulating career as a scholar to have an approach to selecting research projects that seems to just be going to whatever talks are on at your university, being struck by some factoid or other, and then just abandoning any previous body of work you had been building up previously to go chasing something totally new?
Is that a good example that we should build our academic careers on? You imply that he is an eclectic interdisciplinary scholar who shuffles from discipline to discipline, sticking around just long enough to shake it up by making an important discovery.
But I have a really hard time believing that specialists in the fields he drops in and out of would see his research as a serious contribution to their disciplines except presumably the people studying the human genome.
Playing around online with the Google N-grams viewer is without doubt a fun and really addictive way to pass a few mindless hours throwing words into the search box and seeing what pretty graph is thrown up.
What really meaningful and important substantive and theoretical inferences can you draw from using the N-Gram viewer? The things you can use the N-Gram viewer to check out are hardly riveting. Most obviously, when you search some terms and it spits out some graphs, it is almost impossible to use the graphs to draw any inferences about anything meaningful!
In the Science article outlining this empirical tool, they just give a bunch of unconnected demonstrations of some questions that you might use N-Grams to investigate, but their findings from the N-Grams tool are hardly exciting, let alone groundbreaking and let alone being of reasonable interdisciplinary interest.
And that the Nazis kept Jewish artists and academics out of German books during Nazi rule. If your data is just confirming what everyone on the planet already knows and absolutely no-one would dispute, what is so admirable about this project?
What possible explanation could there be for this fascinating empirical result?
Finally, there is a graph showing that Jimmy Carter was mentioned with much greater frequency than Marilyn Monroe from around the time he became President. Does the finding that Jimmy Carter was a lot more likely to be mentioned than Marilyn Monroe while he was the President of the United States genuinely surprise anyone?
And then mention of Chernobyl became less frequent again as time wore on. I really do think he represents almost the polar opposite of everything you have been trying to teach us for years!MATLAB is a high-performance language for technical computing.
It integrates computation, visualization, and programming in an easy-to-use environment where problems and solutions are expressed in common mathematical notation.
MATLAB is an interactive system whose basic data type is the array or. Electromagnetic Simulation Using the FDTD Method [Dennis M.
Sullivan] on lausannecongress2018.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A straightforward, easy-to-read introduction to the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) is one of the primary computational electrodynamics modeling .
Assignment: Scientific Method Activity Using the scientific method to figure out how to solve cars problems With the scientific method activity I went, with the car experiment.
I had to experiment my concepts before, I can found the correct problem. The Scientific Revolution was a series of events that marked the emergence of modern science during the early modern period, when developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology (including human anatomy) and chemistry transformed the views of society about nature.
The Scientific Revolution took place in Europe towards the end of the Renaissance period and continued through . Using Significant Figures in Precise Measurement Share Flipboard Email So would have three significant figures while has only one significant figure.
Again, this is somewhat variable depending on the textbook. Learn the Scientific Method Steps. . Earth Science THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
The scientific method attempts to explain the natural occurrences (phenomena) of the universe by using a logical, consistent, systematic method of investigation, information (data) collection, data analysis (hypothesis), testing (experiment), and refinement to arrive at a well-tested, well-documented, explanation that is well-supported by evidence, .